Urgensi Judgment Auditor dalam Otomatisasi Proses Audit

Padma Adriana Sari, Sumiadji Sumiadji, Atika Syuliswati


Audit automation helps various stages in the audit process to provide convenience and speed in completing work, including the stages that are usually carried out using judgment. Currently, there have been several studies examining the use of information systems to replace the role of auditors in the audit process. Therefore, this study explores the impact of automation system on the auditor's judgment on the audit process. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with in-depth interviews with senior auditors in public accounting firms. The results showed that the audit automation process has partially shifted the role of the judgment auditor, but there are still parts in the audit process that cannot be replaced by the system. Some judgments that are required by the auditor and cannot be replaced by the system are sample selections, fieldwork, and opinion determination. At these stages, the auditor needs flexibility to take actions that are in accordance with the audit conditions encountered and cannot be standardized in a standard carried out by the system. Auditors can focus on sharpening judgment skills in the sample selection process, fieldwork, and opinion determination so that it is expected to improve audit quality in the future.


Auditor; Judgment; Otomatisasi.

Full Text:



Adrian, A. (2020) Pemanfaatan Robot Process Automation dalam Audit Keuangan. JISAMAR (Journal of Information Sistem, Applied, Management, Accounting and Researh), 4(3), 112-116. Diakses dari https://journal.stmikjayakarta.ac.id/index.php/jisamar/article/view/251

Agoes, S. (2017) AUDITING: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Alles, M. G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2008) Audit Automation for Implementing Continuous Auditing: Principles and Problems. (Department of Accounting, Business Ethics & Information Systems, 180 University Ave). Diakses dari http://raw.rutgers.edu/MiklosVasarhelyi/Resume%20Articles/RESEARCH%20&%20WORKING%20PAPERS/audit%20automation.pdf

Arens, A. A. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Elisabeth, D. M. (2019). Kajian Terhadap Peranan Teknologi Informasi dalam Perkembangan Audit Komputerisasi (Studi Kajian Teoritis). Methomika: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 3(1), 40-53. Diakses dari https://ejurnal.methodist.ac.id/index.php/methomika/article/view/175

Gendrianto, G., Rustandi, B., & Mutaqien, T. Z. (2018) Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment. Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem

Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing dan Perpajakan), 3(1), 37-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v3i1.98

Gunz, S., & Thorne, L. (2020) Thematic Symposium: The Impact of Technology on Ethics, Professionalism and Judgment in Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 153–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04404-4

Hasanah, N., & Rosini, I. (2016). Determinan Audit Judgment: Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jakarta Selatan. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 9(2), 185–194. doi: https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/akuntabilitas/article/view/4022

Libby, R., & Witz, P. (2020). Can Artificial Intelligence Reduce the Effect of Independence Conflicts on Audit Firm Liability? Diakses dari http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3734629

Limen, M. M. P., Karamoy H., & Gamaliel, H. (2017) Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment Pada Auditor. Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 12(2), 224-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.12.2.17547.2017

Manson, S., McCartney, S., & Sherer, M. (2001). Audit automation as control within audit firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(1), 109-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570110381097

Noviari, N. (2007). Pengaruh Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Perkembangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JIAB), 2(1), 2303-1018. Diakses dari https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jiab/article/view/2545

Rahayu, S., & Utami, I. (2016) Ambiguitas Informasi pada Pengambilan Keputusan Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 16(2), 163-172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v16i2.204

Sahifuddin, A., Haryadi, B., & Zuhdi, R. (2015). Mengurai Profesional Judgement Auditor dalam Proses Audit Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 18 Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 16-19 September 2015. Diakses dari http://lib.ibs.ac.id/materi/Prosiding/SNA%20XVIII/makalah/147.pdf

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016) Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach. New York: John wiley@Sons.

Soeprajitno, R. R. W. N. (2019). Potensi Artificial Intelligence (AI) Menerbitkan Opini Auditor? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Airlangga, 4(1), 560-573. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31093/jraba.v4i1.142

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v5i1.218


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License